Sydney Train Drivers’ Sick Leave Surge Sparks Government Allegations

A surge in sick leave among Sydney train drivers disrupted services significantly, sparking accusations from the government. Officials described the event as a coordinated effort to paralyze the rail network. This was reported by the railway transport news portal Railway Supply.

Sydney Train Drivers’ Mass Absences Trigger Service Cancellations

Hundreds of staff failed to report for work, leading to widespread cancellations and delays. The situation persisted into Saturday, causing additional disruptions for passengers throughout the city.

Don’t miss…San Diego Transit Faces Service Cuts, Fare Hikes, and New Funding Plans

Sydney Trains’ leadership attributed the crisis to an unusual mix of absences and unreported sick leave. CEO Matt Longland stated that by Saturday afternoon, 360 train crew members were still missing.

At a tribunal hearing, an executive reported that absences exceeded normal levels by twenty-eight percent. Human resources director Fatima Abbas claimed the increase suggested some sickness claims were deceptive.

The New South Wales government pushed to classify these absences as unlawful industrial action. If confirmed, officials argued, authorities must intervene to prevent further disruptions immediately.

Government Suspects Sydney Train Drivers’ Sick Leave Was Planned

Barrister Jamie Darams, representing Sydney Trains, called the absenteeism spike an “orchestrated maneuver.” He insisted there was no evidence of an illness outbreak that justified widespread sick leave.

A crucial piece of evidence was a message sent by Rail Union convenor Adam Doyle. The message, allegedly inciting staff to disrupt services, fueled suspicions about coordinated action.

Union officials defended Doyle, claiming his mental health was their primary concern. They confirmed he faced no reprimand despite suspicions regarding his controversial message.

Tribunal questioning revealed Sydney Trains had issued notices discouraging partial work bans. Employees were informed they would forfeit pay if participating in such industrial actions.

Partial bans, initially scheduled for February twelfth, were postponed for further negotiations. However, ongoing disputes over conditions fueled uncertainty, leaving passengers facing unpredictable disruptions.

Union attorney Leo Saunders argued sick leave figures lacked context. He suggested the government’s data failed to account for regular fluctuations in staff attendance.

Saunders further contended that no direct evidence proved coordinated sick leave efforts. He dismissed claims of an organized campaign, calling the accusation completely unfounded.

Concerns arose among train drivers regarding potential pay deductions despite normal job performance. Some feared penalties if minor delays occurred, heightening tensions between workers and management.

Sydney Trains acknowledged the risk that a significant number of workers might refuse duties. The agency admitted difficulty mitigating absenteeism on such a large scale.

Legal proceedings continued, with both sides presenting arguments over the legitimacy of staff absences. Deputy President Thomas Roberts adjourned the hearing until Sunday for further deliberations.

Source: www.abc.net.au

News on railway transport, industry, and railway technologies from Railway Supply that you might have missed:

Don’t miss…Amtrak Disruptions Lead to Sound Transit Train Cancellations