German long-distance rail competition faces a critical test
03.06.2026
German long-distance rail competition is entering a sensitive phase as Deutsche Bahn warns that Italo’s planned market entry needs clearer political and regulatory rules. The debate now centers on how competition should work on a network that is already under heavy pressure.

Evelyn Palla, CEO of Deutsche Bahn, has urged policymakers to define a stronger framework before new operators expand into Germany’s long-distance rail market. Her warning follows Italo’s plan to launch high-speed rail services in Germany from 2028, a project that has opened a wider debate about competition, capacity, and infrastructure access.
Italo, the Italian private high-speed rail operator controlled by MSC Group together with other investors, wants to invest about EUR 3.6 billion in Germany, as previously covered by Railway Supply. Its proposed services would focus on some of the country’s busiest corridors, including Munich–Frankfurt–Cologne–Dortmund and Munich–Berlin–Hamburg. These routes are commercially attractive, but they are also at the center of Germany’s wider infrastructure and capacity debate.
German long-distance rail competition needs clearer rules
Deutsche Bahn says it does not reject competition in principle. Palla’s point is narrower: market opening, in her view, has to be organized so that passengers across Germany benefit, not only those moving between large cities that already have strong mobility options.
She warned that competition should not become a goal in itself. Without stronger safeguards, new operators could focus mainly on the most profitable long-distance routes, while less commercially attractive connections receive less attention. That risk sits at the core of Deutsche Bahn’s position in the current debate.
Palla also framed infrastructure as the main challenge for German rail. The question, as she presents it, is not simply whether several operators can run trains. It is whether Germany can still maintain a reliable and regular service for passengers across the entire national network.
Italo wants predictable German rail route access
For Italo, the German project depends on access to infrastructure. The operator wants long-term route usage agreements, because investment in trains and operations requires greater planning certainty. Without that predictability, the business case for entering Germany becomes harder to secure.
Germany has not used such framework contracts since 2017. Rail capacity is instead allocated annually through the timetable planning process. The system keeps scheduling flexible, but it gives less certainty to operators preparing major long-term investments.
Italo’s initial plan includes an hourly service on the Munich–Frankfurt–Cologne–Dortmund route. The company also wants to run trains every two hours between Munich, Berlin, and Hamburg. It has also requested that a minimum share of capacity be reserved for new market entrants.
The requests have been submitted to the Bundesnetzagentur, Germany’s network regulatory authority. The regulator also supervises the allocation of rail capacity. No decision has yet been announced, so the Italo Germany high-speed rail plan remains dependent on regulatory clarification.
DB InfraGO rejects special treatment for one competitor
Philipp Nagl, head of DB InfraGO, has opposed special rules that would favor a single competitor. DB InfraGO, Deutsche Bahn’s infrastructure company, is responsible for Germany’s rail infrastructure and train path allocation under regulatory oversight.
The dispute brings together two policy objectives that are not easy to balance. Germany wants more competition and more attractive services for passengers. At the same time, the network is already heavily strained, and the routes targeted by Italo are among the busiest and most commercially valuable in the country.
For Italo, certainty over infrastructure access is essential. The company has said it wants to invest in new trains, most likely from the Siemens Velaro family. This is the same technical platform used for the ICE 3neo, and unresolved access guarantees could affect both the timeline for the Siemens contract and the intended 2028 launch.
Profitable routes are the core of the DB warning
German long-distance rail competition is becoming most controversial on the strongest corridors. Italo is trying to apply a model already used in Italy, where competition with the FS group increased supply in the high-speed segment and put pressure on fares.
Germany is a more complicated market. Deutsche Bahn remains the dominant long-distance operator, but it also runs an extensive national network. Profitable routes help sustain broader connectivity, including services that may be less attractive from a commercial point of view.
This is the heart of Palla’s criticism. She warned that new operators could concentrate on the strongest corridors without taking on comparable obligations for wider connectivity. Major city routes could then receive even more trains, while connections in less populated areas could become weaker.
The DB chief has called for better political conditions to prevent unchecked competition. Her position is that market opening should be designed so that benefits reach the country more broadly, rather than only the most profitable parts of the network.
A German rail test with European implications
The Italo case is not only about one operator entering Germany. It raises a broader question about how competition in long-distance rail should be organized when infrastructure is congested, construction work is frequent, punctuality remains a concern, and major investment is still needed.
For passengers, more competition could mean additional trains, better service, and more attractive fares. For Deutsche Bahn, the risk is that liberalization could mainly benefit rivals on the routes with the strongest commercial returns, without strengthening the wider system.
For now, the project depends on the German regulator and on clearer rules for route access. If the plan moves forward, Germany could become the next major European high-speed rail market where a private challenger directly tests the position of the incumbent operator.
